The on-chain competition is always watching, but sometimes it will be compelled to help.Offchain Labs, the core team behind the After fixes were implemented, the issues were detailed Friday in a “We believe that if your current protocol were deployed on mainnet, it would put user funds at very high risk,” Offchain Labs said it told OP Labs in a late March message, adding that “example exploit code” had been included for informational purposes.Arbitrum and Optimism are so-called To prevent bad actors from abusing the optimistic nature of Arbitrum and Optimism, both networks utilize The issues identified by Offchain Labs pertained to the time alloted for participants to “make a move” to contest transactions through Optimism’s fraud prevention system. By abusing that timing to their advantage, a bad actor could have tricked the system into accepting a fraudulent chain history, or to prevent it from accepting the correct chain history, according to Felton’s post.“The OP protocol as originally deployed on testnet was susceptible to traitor attacks of this type because it allowed a traitor to get time credit it didn’t deserve,” he explained. “The result was that the fraud proof system didn’t improve security guarantees.”Offchain Labs’ intervention with Optimism comes as Ethereum layer-2s continue to make new use of “From an adoption perspective, Optimism and Arbitrum are two of the largest among Ethereum layer-2s. According to a Dune Though the security issues could’ve caused headaches for users down the line, nipping them on Optimism’s testnet means that ultimately nobody was impacted. When it comes to layer-2s with comparable architectures looking out for each other, a spokesperson for OP Labs told “We’re always appreciative when teams take the time to review our testnet code,” the spokesperson said in a statement. “It’s a critical part of the development process.”Edited by Ryan Ozawa.
