Foreign crypto exchanges in India face uncertain future

The Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) — an agency of India’s Ministry of Finance that gathers financial intelligence about offenses under the country’s Prevention of Money Laundering Act — issued a notice of noncompliance to Binance, HTX, Kraken, Gate.io, KuCoin, Bitstamp, MEXC Global, Bittrex and Bitfinex for illegally operating in India on Dec. 28, 2023.

The notice gave the firms 12 days to comply with Indian Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations.

Two weeks after the FIU notice, on Jan. 10, Apple’s App Store in India blocked the foreign crypto exchanges that received the FIU notice. Within a week, the crypto exchanges were unavailable on Google’s Play store, followed by a ban on the URLs and alternate URLs of the crypto platforms.

The ban on foreign crypto exchanges shocked many Indian crypto traders who had rushed to foreign crypto exchanges to evade the hefty 30% tax on cryptocurrency trading profits imposed by the Indian government. According to a report in the Economic Times, nearly $4 billion worth of crypto assets were stuck on offshore platforms, with almost 80% of this held by Binance. The report also cites research on the use of foreign crypto exchanges by Indian traders, which costs the Indian government 30 billion rupees (roughly $361 million) in tax revenue each year.

The latest compliance action from the Indian government against foreign crypto exchanges comes amid a regulatory environment in which there are no clear regulations for domestic exchanges to follow.

Recent: Can Bitcoin become legal tender in Europe? One German MP thinks so

Despite years of campaigns and demand for clear regulations, the Indian government has not offered clarity.

Siddharth Sogani, CEO of blockchain analytics firm Crebaco Global, which has worked with the Indian Ministry of Finance on digital asset regulations, told Cointelegraph that although the compliance-based actions were necessary to block Indian traders from evading taxes, the government should first focus on domestic exchanges:

Sogani referred to recent instances where crypto exchange users of platforms, such as Bitbns, have complained about being unable to withdraw their funds, with some reportedly locked out for over six months.

@bitbns I’ve started crypto journey wid @bitbns. It’s been close to 5 years since I have been your user. I still have many tolens in the wallet. My inr withdrawal is stuck for many days. It’s so unethical to harass your customers. Please let me withdraw my money.— Kishor Jha (@kishjha) February 6, 2024

On the other hand, Rajagopal Menon, vice president of Indian exchange WazirX, told Cointelegraph that the FIU action was long overdue, as foreign exchanges were making merry at the expense of Indian exchanges thanks to regulatory and tax arbitrage:

Menon said regulations are inevitable because India is a signatory to the Group of 20, or G20 Delhi declaration, which outlines a roadmap for crypto regulations: “All G20 countries are expected to have regulations in place by 2025. We hope for serious traction once the new government takes office.”

India has called for global collaboration on crypto regulations on multiple occasions, but at home, it has postponed crypto-focused legislation in parliament for over five years.

India has remained an uncertain ground for crypto exchanges despite its vast potential.

During the last bull cycle in 2021, India became one of the fastest-growing crypto markets, with billions in daily trading volume. Many crypto exchanges and platforms showed their interest in opening an office in the country, but unclear crypto regulations along with the hefty 30% crypto tax — with no provision to offset losses — not only deterred foreign crypto companies but also persuaded thriving Indian companies and traders to look for better opportunities outside India.

Sumit Gupta, CEO of the Indian crypto exchange CoinDCX, told Cointelegraph that the FIU ban is just a step toward enforcing regulations. He said that the framework is in place to allow offshore exchanges to register and serve Indian customers under FIU guidelines.

He added that the FIU’s action would “reassure government stakeholders, safeguard Indian investors from potential bad actors and tax-related noncompliances and, most importantly, prepare the industry for supportive regulations, including fairer taxation.”

Cointelegraph contacted Binance, Kraken, KuCoin, MEXC, Bitfinex and Huobi about their plans in India. However, most refused to comment.

A spokesperson from Binance told Cointelegraph that the firm “remain[s] committed to adherence to local regulations and laws, and we are dedicated to maintaining active communication with regulators to ensure user protection and the development of a healthy Web3 industry. Updates with relevant information will be promptly shared through our official channels.”

A spokesperson from HTX told Cointelegraph that the exchange currently has no operations in India, adding that it would “respect and strictly follow regulatory requirements across different countries and regions globally.”

According to YouTuber SMC Kapil Dev, OKX was one of the first foreign crypto exchanges to work with existing compliance requirements and re-start KYC for Indian customers. OKX didn’t respond to Cointelegraph’s requests for comments.

In a post on X, Indian crypto influencer Aditya Singh said that most of the crypto exchanges he has talked with have already responded to the FIU notice and are currently working to resolve the issue.

Spoke to few foreign exchanges, they are already working on FIU registration & have responded to their emails.

India is a big market for all of them.

Will share more updates on this in a video.— Aditya Singh (@CryptooAdy) January 30, 2024

Singh also suggested that the FIU registration for foreign crypto exchanges might begin after the general elections in India conclude in July 2024.