R.I.P. Unhosted Wallet Rule

4 months ago |   readers | 6 mins reading
R.I.P. Unhosted Wallet Rule

In 2020, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network proposed imposing know-your-customer requirements on unhosted wallets, drawing immense backlash from the crypto industry. This week, the Treasury Department formally withdrew the proposal.
You’re reading State of Crypto, a CoinDesk newsletter looking at the intersection of cryptocurrency and government. Click here to sign up for future editions.
A 2020 proposal by the U.S. Treasury Department that raised quite a bit of consternation appears to be finally dead (after years of being mostly dead).
Anyone involved in the policy or policy-adjacent crypto space in 2020 will remember this proposal. Seemingly the entire U.S. crypto industry banded together to file thousands of comments urging the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and Treasury Department not to impose strict know-your-customer requirements on smart contracts or individuals maintaining their own wallets.
In the closing days of the Donald Trump presidency, the U.S. Treasury Department – through the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, its financial crimes watchdog – issued a proposal for imposing know-your-customer requirements on unhosted wallets. This proposal was seen as being technically impossible to comply with for most wallets, given they aren’t companies or entities and therefore don’t normally record that type of personal data.
At the time, the proposal drew a huge amount of backlash. Lawmakers (including from the then-president’s own party), company leaders and lobbyist groups all pushed back against the proposal, which was spearheaded by then-Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin. Legal experts noted that the proposal’s reporting requirements and definitions were too vague to be practically useful. It was also unclear how exactly exchanges or other entities might be able to implement the proposed rules.
The industry scored a major victory against the proposal after an initial comment period was extended by 15 days, ensuring that President Joe Biden would be in office and Trump/Mnuchin would not be.
The rule kind of popped its head up here and there, but was never seriously considered again. Finally on Aug. 19, 2024, the entire proposal was officially withdrawn.
Michael Mosier, the former acting director of FinCEN, told CoinDesk the withdrawal, “shows that public servants see value in first collaboratively engaging risk/opportunity through innovation and empowerment around the financial equivalent of mobile phones, rather than rushing to limit people to landlines, switchboard operators, mailed checks, and everyone’s home address in a public phone book to keep them ‘safe.’
Another proposal from FinCEN – also from the tail end of 2020 – remains alive. This proposal would implement the Travel Rule, a Financial Action Task Force regime that looks to take on money laundering via crypto by having financial institutions report personal information for the senders and receivers of transactions over a certain limit.
The original 2020 proposal set the limit at $250, well below the $3,000 threshold currently set for similar financial reporting, but this week’s notice did not mention any adjustment to the threshold.
In a tweet, Mosier said the inclusion only tells the White House Office of Management and Budget that Treasury may take action on this proposal.
“Items can be on there for many years but not move,” he said.
There was a fair amount of chatter on X (formerly known as the bird site, the hell site or Twitter) about a report that Vice President Kamala Harris was considering current Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler to be her Treasury Secretary if she wins the presidential election. This report went viral on crypto social media.
I reached out to a number of individuals who regularly engage with Senate staffers or work with lawmakers, all of whom said the story was false.
Sheila Warren, from the Crypto Council for Innovation, and Caitlin Long, of Custodia Bank, both also confirmed that this story does not appear to be real.
My colleague Ben Schiller took a look at this story in Tuesday’s The Node newsletter, but I also wanted to deconstruct this a little, given the sheer amount of attention it received from individuals who believe it confirmed their worst fears about Harris.
One of the named sources in the article was Congressman Tom Emmer, currently the House Majority Whip, but the article specifically refers to a previous interview he gave to the Reporter. In that interview, the Reporter said, “Emmer criticized the current Biden-Harris administration for being staffed with left-wing activists, and warned that some of those staffers might enter a potential Harris administration. Emmer pointed to Gary Gensler, the Chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).”
Staffers with Emmer’s office did not return requests for comment by press time on whether they’d heard something concrete to form the basis for his previous remarks.
Another named source was Katie Biber, the chief legal officer at Paradigm. Here too, the basis appears to be a past tweet, where Biber referred to a hypothetical about the political makeup of the SEC (which is composed of five commissioners) in a thread that didn’t touch on the Treasury Department at all.
An outside spokesperson for Paradigm said the company declined to comment.
Now, the reason I’m bringing this up at all is because of the sheer amount of attention it received from people in the industry who claim to abide by the “don’t trust, verify” motto – but appear ready to believe anything they see with no questions asked.
The law of whatevers suggests that it’s always possible this story is true – but the evidence isn’t there yet.
Wednesday
If you’ve got thoughts or questions on what I should discuss next week or any other feedback you’d like to share, feel free to email me at nik@coindesk.com or find me on Twitter @nikhileshde.
You can also join the group conversation on Telegram.
See ya’ll next week!
Edited by Stephen Alpher.
Disclosure
Please note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal information has been updated.CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. In November 2023, CoinDesk was acquired by the Bullish group, owner of Bullish, a regulated, digital assets exchange. The Bullish group is majority-owned by Block.one; both companies have interests in a variety of blockchain and digital asset businesses and significant holdings of digital assets, including bitcoin. CoinDesk operates as an independent subsidiary with an editorial committee to protect journalistic independence. CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive options in the Bullish group as part of their compensation.
Nikhilesh De is CoinDesk’s managing editor for global policy and regulation. He owns marginal amounts of bitcoin and ether.

This article is originated from the source

CoinDesk
Read Full Article
Published on Other News Site
cointelegraph Badgebitcoin Badgedecrypt Badgecryptonews Badgeu Badgebeincrypto Badgeblockworks Badgecoincodex Badge