Matter Labs faces backlash over ‘zero-knowledge’ trademark attempt Legal 2 weeks ago

Matter Labs faces backlash over ‘zero-knowledge’ trademark attempt Legal 2 weeks ago

Several Ethereum-related projects — including StarkWare, Polyhedra, and Polygon — condemned Matter Labs’ efforts to trademark “zero-knowledge” as its intellectual property in a May 30 joint statement.The statement was signed by notable industry figures, including Polygon co-founders Sandeep Nailwal and Brendan Farmer, StarkWare CEO Eli Ben-Sasson, Polyhedra Network co-founder Tiancheng Xie, and Turing Award winner Shafi Goldwasser.Zero Knowledge (ZK) blockchains have gained wide popularity as a solution that enhances developers’ security and scalability. By leveraging the robust security of existing layer-1 blockchains like Ethereum, ZK blockchains allow decentralized applications (dApps) to achieve higher throughput and faster transactions.These blockchains protect users’ personal information by keeping it off-chain and reduce costs for end-users through batched transaction publishing.Industry experts assert that “ZK is a public good that should belong to everyone.” They argue that Matter Labs’ attempt to trademark the term contradicts the ethos of crypto, Ethereum, and its principles. They stated:“ZK should remain a public good. It shouldn’t be a trademark of a corporation: it should rather be accessible for all.”Polygon corroborated this view in a separate social media post.The Ethereum layer-2 blockchain network opined that “openness is fundamental to Ethereum and must be preserved, especially regarding core mathematical principles.” It added:“[Matter Labs] may claim to do this for the benefit of users. But ask yourself: Will users truly benefit if one company monopolizes zk technology? Would zkSync as a network even exist without the zk technology developed by Polygon Labs? No, a trademark on ‘zk’ actually introduces user harm through confusion.”Consequently, the crypto leaders urge the community to demand the withdrawal of Matter Labs’ trademark applications.In response to the allegations, Matter Labs CEO Alex Gluchowski stated his opposition to the concept of intellectual property. He emphasized that the trademarks were designed to protect crypto users rather than the company.He added:“All the trademarks we had ever registered, including ZK-related ones, are defensive, to prevent dishonest actors from misleading their customers and confusing their products and services with the ones offered by Matter Labs.”Gluchowski also mentioned that Matter Labs had contacted the Ethereum Foundation’s legal team and offered to collaborate on creating a legal framework for using “ZK” and similar critical tech terms in the public domain.Oluwapelumi values Bitcoin’s potential. He imparts insights on a range of topics like DeFi, hacks, mining and culture, underlining transformative power.AJ, a passionate journalist since Yemen’s 2011 Arab Spring, has honed his skills worldwide for over a decade. Specializing in financial journalism, he now focuses on crypto reporting. Follow us on X for your essential dose of daily crypto news and deep dives.CryptoSlate’s latest market report dives deep into the effects corporate Bitcoin purchases have on the market.Disclaimer: Our writers’ opinions are solely their own and do not reflect the opinion of CryptoSlate. None of the information you read on CryptoSlate should be taken as investment advice, nor does CryptoSlate endorse any project that may be mentioned or linked to in this article. Buying and trading cryptocurrencies should be considered a high-risk activity. Please do your own due diligence before taking any action related to content within this article. Finally, CryptoSlate takes no responsibility should you lose money trading cryptocurrencies.